中国服务贸易高质量发展对策分析外文翻译资料-文献翻译网

中国服务贸易高质量发展对策分析

摘要：With the continuous transformation and adjustment of Chinas economic structure, the service industry has developed more and more rapidly, becoming a major driving force for Chinas economic growth. On the one hand, the total volume of Chinas service trade has increased year by year, but the trade deficit is large. On the other hand, Chinas service trade structure has been continuously optimized, but the service trade competitiveness value of various industries is relatively low. From the perspective of labor-intensive service trade, capital-intensive service trade and technology-knowledge-intensive service trade, it can scientifically reflect the relationship between service trade and economic growth. The liberalization of service trade and the scale of trade are conducive to stimulating economic growth and promoting technological progress; the increase in the complexity of service trade exports has shaped the core competitiveness and upgraded the export structure to achieve high-quality development.

关键词：Service trade; upgrading of export structure; high-quality development; international competitiveness

引用文献一：

An Empirical Study on the International Competitiveness Level of Chinas Communication Service Trade(中国通信服务贸易国际竞争力水平的实证研究)：

原文作者 Xiaoyu Zhu;Ruoheng Hu;Wenjing Ji

单位 Beijing Normal University

本研究首先简要分析了中国通信服务贸易的发展状况。然后根据2002年至2017年的相关数据，通过因子分析计算每年的综合得分;最后，我们绘制了竞争力水平变化的雷达图，对中国通信服务贸易的国际竞争力水平进行了实证分析。研究结论如下：

（1）从2001年到2018年，中国电信服务贸易进出口总值呈逐年增长趋势，进出口差距逐步扩大。中国通信服务贸易的国际竞争力水平总体较弱，但2006年以后的总体竞争力持续提高。

（2）中国电信服务贸易国际竞争力水平的衡量指标主要有两个，即两个主要构成要素，即产业因素和国际影响因素。

（3）中国通信服务贸易的国际竞争力不仅总体上呈上升趋势，而且在2002年至2017年间呈逐年上升趋势，但综合得分在2009年仍处于低谷。

外文文献出处：Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance

Keywords: Communication service trade, International competitiveness, Factor analysis method, SPSS

This study first briefly analyzed the development status of Chinas communication service trade; then based on the related data from 2002 to 2017, the comprehensive score of each year was calculated through factor analysis; and finally, we drew a radar chart of changes in competitiveness level to conduct an empirical analysis of the international competitiveness level of Chinas communication service trade. The conclusions of the study are as follows:

(1) The overall import and export values of Chinas telecommunication service trade showed an annual growth trend from 2001 to 2018, and the gap between import and export was gradually increasing. The international competitiveness level of Chinas communication service trade is generally weak, but the overall competitiveness after 2006 has continued to increase.

(2) There are mainly two measurement indicators of the international competitiveness level of Chinas telecommunication service trade, that is, two Principal component factors, which are the industry factor and the international influence factor.

(3) The international competitiveness of Chinas communications service trade not only showed an upward trend in general, but also increased more and more from 2002 to 2017. However, the comprehensive scores have a valley in 2009.

引用文献二：

Research about the Influence of CEPA on the Service Trade in Mainland China and Hong Kong(CEPA对中国内地和香港服务贸易的影响研究)：

原文作者 Chen Yan

单位 University of Michigan

通过差异分析，我们得出以下结论：第一，CEPA极大地促进了香港对中国大陆的服务贸易输出。《安排》实施后，香港对中国内地的服务贸易产值平均增加了107亿港元，达到109亿港元。其次，在运输服务贸易方面，结果不如预期，主要取决于香港与中国内地的贸易条件和贸易状况。第三，在旅游方面，CEPA具有很大的促进作用。第四，在保险方面，CEPA促进了香港向中国内地的保险服务输出，但效果不大。第五，在金融业和其他商业服务方面，CEPA的促进作用不明显。

外文文献出处：Journal of Service Science and Management

Keywords: CEPA, Service Trade, Difference-in-Difference

Through difference-in-difference analysis we conclude that: First, service trade output from Hong Kong to Mainland China has been significantly promoted by CEPA. After the implementation of CEPA, the service trade output from Hong Kong to Mainland China was averagely increased by 10.7 billion Hong Kong dollars to 10.9 billion Hong Kong dollars. Second, in the aspect of transportation service trade, the result was not as good as expected which is mainly determined by the trade terms and trade status between Hong Kong and Mainland China. Third, in the aspect of tourism, CEPA has a great promotion effect. Fourth, in the aspect of insurance, CEPA has promoted the output of insurance services from Hong Kong to Mainland China but the effect is small. Fifth, in the aspect of financial industry and other business service aspects, the promotion effect of CEPA is not significant.

引用文献三：

Comparative Study and Suggestions on Sino-US Service Trade Structure（中美服务贸易结构比较研究与建议）：

原文作者 Yuefeng HAN

单位 The University of Chicago

目前，我国服务贸易出口和服务业出口主要包括低价值和劳动密集型产业，而服务贸易的进口是高价值，技术密集型产业。和知识密集型。根据有关数据以及研究结果和研究结论，与美国相比，中国的服务贸易结构缺乏合理性和科学性。

中国服务贸易结构和服务业建设的主要特征和明显特征是劳动密集型。不仅是我国服务业的优势和优势，也是制约我国服务贸易结构和服务业结构优化升级的主要因素。全球服务贸易结构的趋势已经从劳动密集型转变为技术密集型和知识密集型。这种情况和条件变得越来越明显和明显。充分利用我国劳动密集型产业的优势，应大力大力发展高层次的知识密集型，技术密集型服务业和服务贸易，主要和主要集中在生产者服务和生产上。服务。通过服务业结构和服务贸易结构的转变和变化，我们将努力优化我国服务业和服务贸易的内部结构。

随着全球服务业金融的发展和国际服务贸易经济的改善，中国应大力加强和积极加强政府政策支持，主要是加强国家政策扶植，把知识和技术服务业作为首要和基础性发展目标。同时，在我们国家，我们还应确保和保证将财政激励措施，信贷和税收与政府政策支持，国家政策培育及其促进相结合。为了促进和促进金融通信，知识密集型和技术密集型行业以及制造服务行业中的通信的快速发展和完善，它不仅在全球范围内提升和提升了我们的国际形象以及在服务贸易和服务行业中全球重要的地位不仅为全世界提供了及时的大力支持，而且为我国各行各业的发展和国际贸易的改善提供了培育。

根据以上研究结果和研究结论，首先，我们应进一步大力巩固和巩固美国，日本，英国等许多发达国家的服务贸易市场，大力规范和适当调整服务贸易比重和服务水平。工业占领了针对欧洲县。其次，由于东欧和俄罗斯重工业的先进技术，丰富而充足的服务资源以及我国对劳动密集型工业出口的迫切需求，与这些发达国家和地区的贸易有着巨大和巨大的潜力。与他们合作的许多机会。此外，随着拉丁美洲的贸易经

剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料