绝对值不等式: 高中生的解决方案和误解外文翻译资料

 2023-01-09 14:57:19

本科毕业设计(论文)

外文翻译

绝对值不等式: 高中生的解决方案和误解

作者:Nava Almog 和 Bat-Sheva Ilany

国籍:以色列

出处:数学教育研究,2012, Vol.81 (3), pp.347-364.

摘要:不等式是高中数学课程的基础学科之一,但对于学生如何学习某些类型的不等式缺乏学术研究。本文通过介绍一项研究结果填补了部分研究空白,该研究调查了高中学生学习绝对值不等式的方法、常见错误、错误观念以及这些错误和错误观念的可能来源。该研究使用了两种工具——问卷调查和个人访谈。问卷发给了以色列10年级和11年级的481名学生,他们在中级和高级水平学习数学。这是在学生学习不等式之后进行的,对32名学生进行了访谈,以便找到他们的思维方式和错误来源。找到了学生在解决绝对值不等式时经常出现的错误。根据研究结果,教师可以了解学生的思维过程,并运用这种理解进行修复,增强数学教学。

关键词:绝对值不等式; 错误; 误解

1 方法

1.1样本

在以色列的高中,代数不等式主要教授高等数学水平。即便如此,讨论通常也是有限的,强调代数运算的实用算法视角。学习数学分为三个级别:3级,4级和5级。4级和5级的学生处于中级和高级水平,构成研究人群。在这项研究中,我们选择了来自13所高中的481名学生(来自4级的280名学生和来自5级201名学生)的代表性样本。所有的学生都已经学习了代数不等式,包括绝对值不等式。因此可以认为这些学生已经接受了该主题的传统教学。

1.2研究工具

这项研究使用了两种工具——问卷调查和个人访谈,以评估学生对绝对值不等式的认识和解决方法。

问卷调查:调查问卷包括八项绝对值不等式任务。尽管在课堂上学生学会了使用代数运算来解决任务,但大多数项目都是有意选择的,无需代数运算就可以解决,从而使问题更加明显。我们选择了没有在课堂上给出的任务,目的是测试学生的理解。对于了解绝对值概念的人来说,问卷调查中大多数任务的解决方案应该立即显而易见。问卷上的任务包括各种类型的结果:

结果为无穷大解集或互补集是无穷大的任务。其中包括以下内容:

— 任务1: |x| gt;3 (解决方案是:{x/xgt;3 或 xlt;minus;3})

— 任务2: |xminus;2| lt;1 (解决方案是:{x/1lt;xlt;3})

结果为R的任务。包括以下内容:

— 任务3:|x| 1gt;0

— 任务4: |x|ge;0

结果仅与一个值有关的任务。其中包括以下内容:

— 任务5:|x| le;0 (解决方案是:{x/x=0})

— 任务6: |x| gt;0 (解决方案是:{x/xne;0})

结果为phi;的任务。包括以下内容:

— 任务7: |x| lt;0

— 任务8:|x| 1 le;0

问题以随机顺序提供给学生,调查问卷的目的是评估:

①学习该学科后正确解决绝对值不等式的学生比例

②学生以何种方式解决绝对值不等式问题,重点关注以下两个问题:

(a)学生是否会使用图表来解决绝对值不等式?如果会,他们是否正确有效地使用它们?文献报道,使用图表来解决不等式是非常有效的。

(b)学生是否会使用数轴来解绝对值不等式?如果会,他们是否正确有效的使用它?

③在解决绝对值不等式问题时,学生通常会犯哪些错误?

个人访谈:我们对回答问卷的学生进行了32次半结构化的个人访谈(来自4级的18名学生和来自5级的14名学生)。在对问卷进行分析后,我们根据他们的书面答案选择了哪些学生进行面试。我们选择了那些给出不标准答案的学生,不管是正确的还是错误的,或者那些只给出最终结果却没有详细说明他们是如何完成任务的学生。访谈的目的是讨论学生对任务的处理方法,以便充分理解他们的思维方式,找出正确和错误解决方案的原因。

2 结果

我们根据两个因素分析结果:正确的解决方法和常见的错误。我们将未给出解题过程的归类为错误,表1根据级别显示正确答案,错误答案和缺失答案的百分比。

表1 答案百分比分布

任务

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

|x|gt;3

|xminus;2| lt;1

|x| 1 gt;0

|x| ge;0

|x| le;0

|x| gt;0

|x| lt;0

|x| 1 le;0

正确

35

22.9

42.1

56.8

43.2

43.9

61.4

43.6

Level 4

60.2

47.8

61.7

82.6

76.6

67.7

83.1

74.1

Level 5

45.5

33.3

50.3

67.6

57.2

53.8

70.5

56.4

Total

不正确

45

47.5

32.5

18.2

32.2

35

16.8

31.4

Level 4

37.3

44.2

35.8

14.9

21.9

31.3

14.4

20.9

Level 5

41.8

46.1

33.9

16.8

27.8

33.5

15.8

27

Total

空白

20

29.6

25.4

25

24.6

21.1

21.8

25

Level 4

2.5

8

2.5

2.5

1.5

1

2.5

5

Level 5

12.7

20.6

15.8

15.6

15

12.7

13.7

16.6

Total

chi;2

46.27

48.81

47.999

49.69

69.14

49.89

39.74

49.773

P lt;0.00001

测试显示在解决每个任务时,4级和5级学生之间的成功率存在明显差异。只有不到50%的4级学生正确回答了6项任务,大约60%的学生正确回答了剩下的两项任务。较大比例的5级学生找到了正确的解决方案,但是他们中的很多人也呈现了许多任务的错误解决方案。例如,只有47.8%的5级学生正确回答了任务2,而44.2%的学生提供了错误的解决方案,剩下的8%没有尝试解决这个问题。

结果发现,大约24%的4级学生和5级学生没有回答几项任务,在一次采访中,Uzi(4级)解释说,他没有回答任务1,因为他不确定如何解决它。在另一次采访中,奥伦(5级)说他没有解决任务2,因为他不记得他是否必须使用指定的方法。这些学生并没有试图通过理解来解决不等式。

不到一半的学生为任务1和2提供了正确的解决方案,而超过50%的学生成功解决了其他任务。这可能是因为这些任务,尤其是任务2,比其他任务更复杂。任务4和7显示出,成功率约为70%。

2.1正确的解决方案

没有代数运算的直接解的结果显示,除了任务2之外,大多正确回答的学生在没有进行代数运算的情况下立即得到了解决方案(表2)。例如:

表2 按不同的解题方法得到正确答案的百分比

任务

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

|x|gt;3

|xminus;2|lt;1

|x| 1gt;0

|x| ge;0

|x|le;0

|x|gt;0

|x|lt;0

|x| 1le;0

立即解决

没有代数 35.1 0 49.3 59.7 53 45.3 66.9 55.6

运算

使用公式

8.2

lt;

剩余内容已隐藏,支付完成后下载完整资料


本科毕业设计(论文)

外文翻译

附:外文原文

Absolute value inequalities: high school studentsrsquo; solutions and misconceptions

作者:Nava Almog amp; Bat-Sheva Ilany

国籍:Israel

出处:Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2012, Vol.81 (3), pp.347-364.

Abstract: Inequalities are one of the foundational subjects in high school math curricula, but there is a lack of academic research into how students learn certain types of inequalities. This article fills part of the research gap by presenting the findings of a study that examined high school studentsrsquo; methods of approaching absolute value inequalities, their common mis- takes, misconceptions, and the possible sources of these mistakes and misconceptions. The research study used two tools—a questionnaire and personal interviews. The questionnaire was given to 481 students in the 10th and 11th grades in Israel who studied mathematics at intermediate and advanced levels. It was administered after the students had studied inequal- ities. Thirty-two students were interviewed in order to find their ways of thinking and the sources of their errors. The main types of mistakes that students consistently made when solving absolute value inequalities were found. Based on the studyrsquo;s findings, teachers can understand studentsrsquo; thought processes and use this understanding to conduct remediation and enhance mathematics instruction.

Keywords: Absolute value inequalities ; Errors .;Mistakes

1 Methodology

1.1 Sample

In Israeli high schools, algebraic inequalities are mainly taught to advanced mathematics levels. Even so, discussions are usually limited, emphasizing the practical algorithmic perspective of algebraic manipulations. There are three levels of learning mathematics: levels 3, 4, and 5. The students in levels 4 and 5—the intermediate and advanced levels, respectively—comprise the population of the research. For this research study, we chose a representative sample of 481 students (280 students from level 4 and 201 students from level 5) from 13 high schools. All of the students had already finished studying algebraic inequalities, including absolute value inequalities. It can be assumed that these students have received a traditional teaching of the subject.

1.2 Research tools

This research study used two tools—a questionnaire and personal interviews—in order to assess studentsrsquo; knowledge of, and approaches to solving, absolute value inequalities.

Questionnaire: The questionnaire consisted of eight absolute value inequality tasks. Most items were intentionally chosen to be solvable without algebraic manipulations, to make the problem more apparent, although in class the students learned to solve tasks using algebraic manipulation. We chose tasks that students had not been given in class, with the intention to test studentsrsquo; understanding. The solution for most tasks on the questionnaire should be immediately obvious to anyone who understands the concept of absolute value. The tasks on the questionnaire included a variety of types of results:

Tasks where the result is an infinite solution set and the complementary set is also infinite. These included the following:

Task 1: |x| gt;3 (the solution is: {x/xgt;3 or xlt;minus;3})

Task 2: |xminus;2| lt;1 (the solution is: {x/1lt;xlt;3})

Tasks where the result is R. These included the following:

Task 3: |x| 1gt;0

Task 4: |x|ge;0

Tasks where the result is related to only one value. These included the following:

Task 5: |x| le;0 (the solution is: {x/x00})

Task 6: |x| gt;0 (the solution is: {x/xne;0})

Tasks where the result is ϕ. These included the following:

Task 7: |x| lt;0

Task 8: |x| 1 le;0

The questions were given to the students in a random order. The purpose of the questionnaire was to assess:

The percentage of students who correctly solve absolute value inequalities after learning the subject.

In what ways students solve absolute value inequalities, focusing on the following two issues:

(a)Do students use graphs in order to solve absolute value inequalities? If so, do they use them correctly and effectively? Literature reports that the usage of graphs for solving inequalities is highly effective (Dreyfus amp; Eisenberg, 1985; Tsamir amp; Reshef, 2006; Abramovich amp; Ehrlich, 2007).

(b)Do students use the number line in order to solve absolute value inequalities? If so, do they use it correctly and effectively?

(c) What mistakes do students typically make when solving absolute value inequalities?

Interviews: We conducted 32 semi structured personal interviews with students who answered the questionnaire (18 students from level 4 and 14 students from level. After the questionnaires were analyzed, we chose which students to interview based on their written answers. We chose students who presented nonstandard answers, either correct or incorrect, or students who gave only their final result and did not elaborate upon their process of solving the task. The purpose of the interviews was to discuss the studentsrsquo; approaches to the tasks in order to fully comprehend their ways of thinking and identify the causes of both their correct and incorrect solutions.

剩余内容已隐藏,支付完成后下载完整资料


资料编号:[271742],资料为PDF文档或Word文档,PDF文档可免费转换为Word

原文和译文剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付 30元 才能查看原文和译文全部内容!立即支付

以上是毕业论文外文翻译,课题毕业论文、任务书、文献综述、开题报告、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。