The New Public Management Situation
No doubt,many countries in the world,and both developed countries and developing countries,in the late 1980s and early 1990s began a continuous public sector
management reform movement. The reform movement is still in many aspects
government continue to the organization and management of the influence. People inthese reforms view repudiating them. Critics especially in Britain and the United States,critics say the new mode of various problems exist but also does not have theinternational prevailing reform of public management,could not be called paradigm.Criticism from almost every aspect of the change.Most of the academic criticism belong to the mouth. Different schools of thought in detail discussion,The academic journal articles and abstraction,from reality. At the same time,in the practice of public management and implementation of the reform and the change. As I in otherarticles in the thought,in most countries,the traditional public administrative modefor public management mode has been replaced. The reform of public departmentresponded to the realities of several interrelated problems,including: the function of public sector provide public services of low efficiency,Economic theory of change,Private sector related changes impact of globalization,especially as a kind of economic power,Technology changes made decentralization and better controlglobally becomes possible. The administrative management can be divided into three stages: the development of distinct phases, and public administration beforetraditional pattern and public management reform stage. Each stage has its own management mode. From a stage of transition to the next stage is not easy,from thetraditional public administration to public administration has not yet completed the transition. But it was only a matter of time. Because the new mode of theoretical basisis very strong. The new public management movement ', 'although this name,but itis not only a debate in the booming,and in most developed countries have taken thebest management mode of expression. The traditional administrative mode than itrsquo;s age is a great reform, but that time has passed.
A traditional pattern
Obviously,in the late 19th century bureaucracy system theory,not sound already exists some form of administrative management.Public administration has a long
history, and it is the concept of a government and the rise of civilization as history.Asthe case Glad2den Osama bin laden (point),a model of administrative since the
government appears has existed. First is endowed with founder or leader,then is the social or administrative person to organizers of eternity.Administration managementor business is all in social activities,although not among factors, but the glow of social sustainable development is of vital importance. Recognized administrative system in ancient Egypt is already exists,its jurisdiction from the Nile flooding caused by the year to build the pyramids irrigation affairs.China is adopted in the handynasty,Confucian norms that government should be elected,not according to the background,but according to the character and ability,the governmentrsquo;s main goal is to seek the welfare of the people. In Europe,various empire - Greek,Roman,and theholy Roman,Spainrsquo;s administrative empire,they first by the central through variousrules and procedures. Weberrsquo;s thought,'modern' medieval countries develop simultaneously with 'bureaucratic management structure development'. Althoughthese countries in different ways, but they have common features, it can be called before modern. Namely,the administrative system of early essence is thepersonification of, or the establishment in Max Weberrsquo;s 'nepotism' basis,i.e. to loyalto the king or minister certain human foundation,not is personified,With allegiance to the organization or individual basis rather than for the foundation. Although thereare such a viewpoint that administration itself not only praise from traditional mode,the characteristic of early but often leads to seek personal interests corruption or abuseof power. In the early administrative system,we now feel very strange approach hasthe functions of government administration is generally behavior. All those who walkofficial tend to rely on friends or relatives for work or buy officer,which means the money to buy the first officer or tax officials,and then out to the customer to money,which is the first to buy officer recovery investment cost,and can make a fortune. America in the 19th century FenFei system of 'political parties' means in the rulingchanged at the same time,the government of all administrative position is changed.Modern bureaucracy is before 'personal,traditional,diffusion and similar and special',and according to the argument,modeWeber bureaucracy is 'impersonal,rational,concrete,achievement orientation and common'. Personalized government isoften inefficient: nepotism means incompetent not capable person was arranged to positions of leadership,FenFei political corruption,in addition to making often stillexist serious low efficiency.The enormous success of traditional administrative pattern that early practice looks strange. Specialization and not politicizedadministrative in our opinion is so difficult to imagine that trace,there exist other system. Western administrative system even simple selection of officials to pass the exam,until 1854,Britain and north.MG.Trevelyan report after Northcote - began toestablish in China, although the system has long passage.
The traditional public administrative pattern
In the late 19th century,additionally one kind of pattern on the world popular,this is the so-called traditional administrative pattern. Its main theoretical basis from several countries,namely,the American scholars and Germany Woodrow Wilson of Max Weberrsquo;s people put their associated with bureaucracy model,Frederick Tylersystematically elab
剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料
英语译文共 4 页，剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料
资料编号：[265582]，资料为PDF文档或Word文档，PDF文档可免费转换为Word
以上是毕业论文外文翻译，课题毕业论文、任务书、文献综述、开题报告、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。
